Deer
farming is a growing industry in Australia with
demands for antler velvet and venison. Several useful
books on the topic are available (Anderson 1978; Yerex,
1979, 1982) and much of the information in this section
comes from them.
TERMINOLOGY
|
Male |
|
stag, buck |
|
Female |
|
hind, doe |
|
Young |
|
fawn, calf |
|
Pubertal female |
|
jinnock |
|
Young male with
spike-like antlers
in advance of a later full head |
|
spiker |
|
Castrated stag |
|
havier |
|
Naturally polled stag |
|
hummel
|
(extra
information Haigh & Hudson, 1993)
SOCIAL
ORGANISATION, DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES AND
LEADERSHIP
In
general, dominance orders are linear, but during rutting,
triangular relationships are common among males
(Lincoln et al., 1970). There seems to be a stable
relationship between age and social rank,
but this may change during the antler
growth period. The most dominant animal
does not necessarily have the largest
antlers.
It is
important to understand herd behaviour when
deer are farmed. They tend to maintain a loose grouping
when tamed, all rising together, moving to the grazing
area, all grazing and then all returning to their
favourite spot. Deer walk the fenceline and this can
open up the ground and make it prone to erosion. This
can be overcome by proper placement of fences in
areas less likely to be eroded. It is possible that pacing
the fenceline indicates stress (Hodgett et al., 1998).
Deer
shelter from cold winds, so windbreaks can be
provided. Shade and shelter may assist with
thermoregulation (Pollard and Littlejohn, 1999).
Wild
hinds tend to live in ranges overlapping those
of their mothers, while stags disperse from their dam’s
range at about 2–4 years of age to associate loosely
with other stags (Clutton-Brock et al., 1982).
Leadership is usually undertaken by the lead hind,
helped by a second female, who assumes a rear-guard
position during group movement. It is important when
trying to drive a herd that the lead hind is moving in the
right direction.
Even
under intensive farming conditions, fallow
deer may tend to maintain the sexual segregation typical
of this species in the wild, especially during the
birthing season (Mattiello et al., 1997).
Mature
bucks spend most of their time alone or in
bachelor groups until rutting, when they become intolerant
of each other and move to rutting areas to collect
and defend groups of adult hinds (Pépin et al., 2001).
Deer
become aggressive to each other during yard
confinement, with more aggression being observed in
spring. (Pollard and Littlejohn, 1996). Confinement of
established social groups may be stressful, particularly
to low-ranking individuals (Pollard and Littlejohn, 1999).
Mixing of
unfamiliar groups of deer should be avoided.
(Pollard and Littlejohn, 1999). Stress manifests in
conflict or disturbed behaviour (Wiepkema, 1990).
Reduction
in space allowance as a consequence of
higher stocking density results in changes in stress levels,
particularly in subordinate hinds, which are more
sensitive than dominant animals. At high stocking densities,
more agonistic behaviour occurs with bites and
pushes occurring twice as often as those in lower stocking
densities. Fence pacing increases and head movements
are more frequent, suggesting a greater motivation
to escape. Grazing patterns are modified, with
meals being more frequent and synchronisation of grazing
with other hinds decreasing. This is more important
for the subordinate hinds in the group and leads to
breaks in feeding and lower growth rates (Blanc and
Theriez, 1998).
Mixed-sex
groups of fallow deer occur more frequently
when population density increases (Mattiello et
al., 1997).
High
female densities have a deleterious effect on
male forage habitat and nutritional condition. Males
require a higher minimum standing crop of grass/forage
than females to obtain efficient forage intake. As standing
crops are very low after females have grazed, males
are unable to obtain sufficient forage intake and must
move to areas of lower forage quality but higher
biomass (Conradt et al., 1999).
Adult
male fallow deer prefer to feed on hay and
show higher preference than females for corn and bran
meal, while females, depending on lactational status,
prefer pasture. In an intensive farming system, males
will become more active when supplemented feed is
supplied (Mattiello et al., 1997).
Grazing
occurs at dawn, declines throughout the
day and then increases strongly at dusk. In poor weather,
grazing is reduced and sitting periods are increased
at feeding times. Pacing along fence-lines increases in
poor weather, possibly reflecting motivation to find shelter,
which suggests that protection from rain, as well as
windbreaks, affect the welfare of the animals. The uses
of shade and shelter are important, not only in wet
weather conditions but may also assist in thermoregulation
of the animals even in temperate conditions,
enhancing welfare and possibly productivity (Pollard
and Littlejohn, 1999).
Providing
cover in a paddock reduces social interactions
by up to about 60%, aggression by up to 17%,
and reactivity by 50% (Whittington and Chamove,
1995).
SEXUAL
BEHAVIOUR
Red deer
are seasonal-breeding mammals with reproduction
time regulated by photoperiod. Stags are usually
silent except when alarmed, but during the rut they
produce repeated lion-like vocalisations (Pépin et al.,
2001). Other male sexual behaviour includes chasing
and mounting a hind in oestrus (Jaczewski, 1989).
Fights occur among males and it is the dominant stag
who mates. Male mating success is positively related to
dominance and body size (Clutton-Brock et al., 1998).
The stag’s neck hair grows long, the neck enlarges and
he rolls in the mud and thrashes his antlers against
trees or posts to display his dominance.
During
the rut, males of high rank use low-risk
behaviours towards smaller, low-ranked bucks, but
when dealing with bucks of similar rank, they use higher-risk
techniques, such as antler contact and kicking
(Mattiangeli, Mattiello and Verga, 1999).
In
domestic herds mating management is important,
and there are several different strategies:
1. One
stag put with a group of up to 50 hinds. The
group of males is first allowed to sort out the dominant
stag and this is the one put in with the hinds.
2. The
herd sire can be selected by the deer farmer on
the basis of bodyweight and head (i.e., antlers).
3 The
dominant stag can be introduced into the group of
hinds as well as two or three younger males, who keep
the dominant male on his toes.
During
the rut, stags may express visual and
aggressive displays that serve to intimidate, or prompt
assessable responses from competing challengers
(McComb, 1991). There is a danger of overextending a
stag, especially in smaller paddocks (e.g., 10 hectares)
where he can defend his hinds against all comers.
In
selecting mating areas, females avoid isolated
small meadows within scrub areas, preferring larger
meadows where a number of sexually active males may
be found (Carranza and Valencia, 1998).
Female
deer suffer less sexual harassment when in
larger groups. When other groups surround their group,
they have a greater chance of mating with highly competitive
males, promoting male–male competition
before accepting a mate (Carranza and Valencia, 1998).
Roaring by red deer stags advances oestrus in hinds
(McComb, 1987).
Stags may
remain within 5 metres of hinds for up to
10 hours post-copulation, chasing away any males that
approach (Endo, Doi, Shiraki, 1997).
MATERNAL–OFFSPRING BEHAVIOUR
Gestation
is about 233 days and the female is first
mated at about 15–16 months (i.e. at about 65 kg).
Hinds with fawns have a strong preference for an area
far from road disturbances (Mattiello et al., 1997). In the
first week of life, fawns lie hidden in the grass, except
when being fed. In the second week, the animals
become more active, investigating, and tasting possible
food resources, including soil, grass, seeds and water,
without swallowing. The animals start to graze at
2 0 days and begin ruminating one week later
(Birgersson et al., 1998).
Going
into the paddock after the fawns are born is a
risky business because they may lie hidden anywhere.
They remain in their hiding place until disturbed and
then they bolt and often smash into or through the first
fence they reach. Gloves should be worn when fawns
are picked up for weighing and tagging, as a hind will
strike a fawn that has been handled without gloves.
Hinds
quite commonly steal fawns and some cases
of ‘twins’ are thought to be due to this.
Mismothering and allosuckling occur in deer where
female nurses may take care of calves that are not their
own. These calves may occasionally be adopted by a
nursing mother (Vankova et al., 2001).
Occasionally, fawns will suckle from a hind that is
not their mother (allosuckling). This allows fawns of
hinds with lower milk production to have higher growth
rates, thus increasing group size. This increase in group
size may decrease the risk of predation of the hind's
own offspring by creating a dilution effect (Ekvall, 1998).
Male
fawns receive more milk than females. This
maternal investment bias towards males results in
males attaining a large body size. In artificial suckling
systems, male fawns were more likely to empty the
bottle without interruption, suck harder and be more
motivated to obtain milk (Birgersson et al., 1998).
Confinement of fawns indoors and the presence of
a hind improved weight gain in the period following
weaning, and reduced the weaning stress and fear
responses in fawns, especially if the hinds were familiar
with humans, e.g., hand-reared hinds (Pollard et al.,
1992).
Farmed
red deer are normally weaned at 3–4 months
of age, whereas wild members of the species
are normally suckled for 7–8 months and continue to
associate with their dam after weaning (Pollard et al.,
1992).
Weaning
over a period of 10 days (interval weaning)
appears to be less stressful than abrupt weaning and
could therefore reduce susceptibility to stress-related
diseases such as pneumonia and digestive upsets
(Church and Hudson, 1999). Other common reactions
include long periods spent pacing fence lines and loudly
expressing their distress. This behaviour was not evident
in animals weaned over a longer period. Heart rate
and neutrophil/lymphocyte levels were also significantly
higher in abruptly weaned animals, indicating elevated
stress levels (Church and Hudson, 1999).
MUSTERING
It is
best not to move the herd when fawning. At other
times, in small areas, they can be set moving towards a
gate if the farmer can walk around them. Deer are very
curious and will move from one paddock to another to
look at something they have never encountered before.
Quiet
dogs are used by some farmers and others
use a farm bike. Yarding is better done in the evening as
deer are much quieter as it gets dark. In fact, deer tend
to exhibit fewer fear behaviours in dim light (Pollard and
Littlejohn, 1994), so mustering late in the evening may
be advantageous.
Care must
be taken not to alarm groups of deer as
they may take flight, but this depends on the level of
familiarity with the immediate environment and their
habituation to human presence (Recarte et al., 1998).
Females looking after young are more likely to take
flight than males or mixed groups (Recarte et al., 1998).
If deer
do break a fence it is best to leave them until
the next day and they will probably be back in the original
paddock—it seems they have a strong site-attachment
bond.
When deer
must be yarded for long periods, they
should be kept in familiar groups of the same sex and of
similar body size (AACSCAW, 1991).
Movement
through races may be facilitated by
widening the race to about 1.5 m and allowing the deer
to move through two or three abreast (Grigor et al.,
1997). Such movement may be enhanced if the handler
moves behind the group (Jago et al., 1993).
Following
short-term stressful procedures (e.g.,
mustering), animals will reduce their lying time and
increase moving activity when returned to their paddock
(Diverio et al., 1993).
Handling
practices prior to velvet harvesting are
more stressful than the harvesting itself (Mathews and
Cook, 1991).
TRANSPORT
Before
transport, deer should be able to move freely in
and out of the race for a couple of weeks before they
need to be loaded. Then they are put into darkened
yards prior to loading as this keeps them settled.
The
attitude of the farmer to his deer is very important.
He must be conscious of their ‘feelings’ or ‘temperament’,
yet not interfere with them more than necessary.
He must also be firm and in control of them. Deer
become very tame if the farmer moves freely among
them and this makes them much easier to manage.
In deer
farming the human–animal bond plays a crucial
part in the success of the venture.
Neuroleptics can be used to sedate wild deer, to
reduce the stress of translocation. Transport injuries are
reduced and the animals adapt more readily.
Tranquillised animals were able to maintain normal
behavioural patterns while under stress, and were easier
to approach and handle. However, there are some
side-effects, including hypersensitivity, restlessness and
anxiety (Diverio et al., 1993).
Within
travelling groups of deer, the larger animals
initiated the most agonistic behaviour and targeted this
towards smaller animals, hence deer should be transported
with animals of similar size (Jago et al., 1997).
Deer can
be loaded more easily if the loading raceway
is wide enough to allow them to move as a group,
since deer rarely move in single file, but narrow enough
to prevent them from turning around (Grigor, Goddard,
Littlewood and Deakin, 1998a).
The Model
code of practice (AACSCAW, 1991) also
suggests that there should be sufficient space allowed
so that the deer can lie down during the journey.
Both
confinement in the truck and the vehicular
motion are stressful for deer, which is shown by increases
in heart rate, alert behaviour, plasma cortisol levels,
plasma creatine levels and a decrease in rumination
(Grigor et al., 1998b).
Significant stressors during transportation include
removal from the home environment, loading, unloading,
confinement, mixing with unfamiliar individuals,
food and water deprivation, temperature extremes and
vibrations (Grigor et al., 1998b).
In a
study conducted by Grigor et al. (1998b), heart
rate was significantly increased during loading and during
the initial stages of the journey but it decreased as
time went on, suggesting that the deer became accustomed
to the movement in the transporter.
It has
also been suggested that, during transportation,
deer should be positioned closer to the front of the
transport crate, where the vehicular movement is
reduced (Waas et al., 1997).
Confinement of males during transport might lead to
aggressive behaviour, especially when space
allowances are greater (Jago et al., 1993), so higher
stocking densities have some merit, especially for short
journeys.
In low
stocking densities, deer tend to align themselves
parallel to and facing the direction of travel,
avoiding diagonal orientations. In higher densities, the
animals are prevented from standing in their preferred
orientations, with slight avoidance of the right-front and
left-rear diagonal orientation. Higher stocking densities
prevent loss of balance with the deer often in contact
with other animals, which gives a greater amount of
support and prevents impacts and injury. However, in
higher densities, the animals are prevented from lying
down as other animals stand on them. So it is recommended
that densities should be decreased on long
journeys to allow for lying down (Jago et al., 1997).
REFERENCES
Anderson,
R. 1978. Gold on four feet: commercial deer
farming: a new rural industry of outstanding potential.
Ronald Anderson and Associates., Collingwood, Vic.,
Australia.
Australian Agriculture Council, Sub committee on animal
welfare (AACSCAW). (1991) The farming of deer,
Model code of practice for the welfare of animals.
CSIRO Publications, Melbourne.
Birgersson, B., Tillbom, M., Ekvall, K. (1998) Malebiased
investment in fallow deer: an experimental
study. Animal Behaviour, 56, pp 301–307.
Blanc, F.
and Theriez, M. (1998) Effects of stocking
density on the behaviour and growth of farmed red
deer hinds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 56,
297–307.
Blanc, F.
and Theriez, M. (1998) Effects of stocking
density on the behaviour and growth of farmed red
deer hinds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 56, pp
297–307.
Carranza,
J. and Valencia, J., (1998), Red deer
females collect on male clumps at mating areas.
Behavioural Ecology, 10:5, pp 525–532.
Church,
J.S. and Hudson, R.J. (1999) Comparison of
the stress of abrupt and interval weaning of farmed
wapiti calves. Small Ruminant Research. 32 (2),
119–124.
Church,
J.S. and Hudson, R.J. (1999) Comparison of
the stress of abrupt and interval weaning of farmed
wapiti calves (Cervus elaphus). Small Ruminant
Research, 32:2, pp 119–124
Clutton-Brock,
T.H., Green, D., Hiraima-Hasegawa, M. and
Albon, S.D. (1998) Passing the buck: resource
defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer.
Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, pp
281–296.
Clutton-Brock,
T.H., Guinness, F.E. and Albon, S.D.
(1982) Red deer Behaviour and ecology of two sexes,
University of Chicago press, Chicago. Cited by Pollard,
J.C. and Littlejohn, R.P. (1999) Activities and social
relationships of red deer at pasture. NZ Vet. J. 47 (3),
83–87.
Conradt,
L., Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Thomson, D.
(1999) Habitat segregation in ingultes: are males
forced into sub-optimal foraging habitats through indirect
competition by females, Oecologia 119, pp
367–377
Diverio,
S, Goddard, P.J., Gordon, I.J. and Elston, D.A.
(1993) The effect of management on stress in farmed
red deer (Cervus elaphus) and its modulation by long
acting neuroleptics: behavioural responses, Applied
Animal Behavioural Science, 36, 363–376
Ekvall,
K. (1998) Effects of social organisation, age
and aggressive behaviour on allosuckling in wild fallow
deer. Animal Behaviour, 56, pp 695-703.
Endo, A.,
Doi, T. and Shiraki, A. (1997) Post-
Copulatory guarding: Mating behaviour of non-territorial
male sika deer in an enclosure. Applied Animal
Behaviour Science. 54 (2), 257–263.
Grigor,
P.N., Goddard, P.J. and Littlewood, C.A.
(1998b) The behavioural and physiological reactions of
farmed red deer to transport: effects of sex, group,
size, space allowance and vehicular motion. Applied
Animal Behaviour Science. 56, 281–295.
Grigor,
P.N., Goddard, P.J., Littlewood, C.A. and
Deakin, D.W. (1998a) Pre transport loading of farmed
red deer: effects of previous overnight housing environment,
vehicle illumination and shape of loading
race. The veterinary record. 142 (11), 265–268.
Grigor,
P.N., Goddard, P.J., Littlewood, C.J. (1997) The
movement of farmed red deer through raceways.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 52, 171–178.
Haigh,
J.C. & Hudson, R.J. (1993) Farming Wapiti and
Red Deer, St Louis, Mosby.
Hodgetts,
B.V., Wass, J.R. and Matthews, L.R. (1998)
The effects of visual and auditory disturbances on the
behaviour of deer at pasture with and without shelter.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 55, 337–351.
Jaczewski
Z. (1989) Reproduction in the red deer
female and the effect of oestrogens on the antler cycle
and behaviour. Acta Physiol Pol., Jan-Feb;40(1) pp
85–95.
Jago, J.G.,
Harcourt, R.G. and Mathews, L.R. (1997),
The effect of road-type and distance transported on
behaviour, physiology and carcass quality of farmed
red deer (Cervus elaphus). Applied Animal Behaviour
Science, 51, pp 129–141.
Jago, J.G.,
Harcourt, R.G. and Matthews, L.G. (1997)
The effect of road type and distance transported on
behaviour, physiology and carcass quality of farmed
red deer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 51,
129–141.
Jago, J.G.,
Matthews, L.R., Hargraves, A.L. and van
Eeken, F. (1993) Pre slaughter handling of red deer:
Implications for welfare and carcass quality. In proceedings
of a deer course for veterinarians No. 10,
NZVA deer branch, Palmerstown North, 27–39. Cited
by Grigor, P.N., Goddard, P.J. and Littlewood, C.A.
(1998) The behavioural and physiological reactions of
farmed red deer to transport: effects of sex, group,
size, space allowance and vehicular motion. Applied
Animal Behaviour Science. 56, 281–295.
Jago, J.G.,
Matthews, L.R., Hargraves, A.L. and van
Eeken, F. (1993) Pre slaughter handling of red deer:
Implications for welfare and carcass quality. In proceedings
of a deer course for veterinarians No. 10,
NZVA deer branch, Palmerstown North, 27–39. Cited
by Grigor, P.N., Goddard, P.J., Littlewood, C.J. (1997)
The movement of farmed red deer through raceways.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 52, 171–178.
Lincoln,
G.A., Youngson, R.W. and Short, R.V. 1970.
The social and sexual behaviour of Red deer. J.
reprod. Fert. Suppl. 11:71–103.
Mathews,
L.R. and Cook, C.J. (1991) Deer welfare
research - Ruakura findings. Proc. of a Deer Course
for Veterinarians, Deer Branch Course: No. 8, May
1991, Sydney, Australia, pp. 120-127. Cited by Diverio,
S, Goddard, P.J., Gordon, I.J. and Elston, D.A. (1993)
The effect of management on stress in farmed red
deer (Cervus elaphus) and its modulation by long acting
neuroleptics: behavioural responses. Applied
Animal Behavioural Science, 36, pp 363–376
Mattiangeli,V., Mattiello, S. and Verga, M. (1999) The
fighting technique of male fallow deer: An analysis of
agonistic interactions during the rut. J. Zoology. 249 (3)
339–346.
Mattiello,
S., Mattiangeli, V., Bianchi, L. and Carenzi,
C. (1997) Feeding and social behaviour of fallow deer
under intensive pasture confinement. J. Animal Sci. 75
(2), 339–347.
Mattiello,
S., Mttiangeli, L., Bianchi, L. and Carenzi, C.
(1997) Feeding and social behaviour of fallow deer
(Dama dama L.) under intensive pasture confinement,.
Journal of Animal Science, 75:2, pp 339–347.
McComb,
K.E. (1987) Roaring by red deer stags
advances the date of oestrus in hinds. Nature. 330,
648–649.
McComb,
K.E. (1991) Female choice for high roaring
rates in red deer. Animal Behaviour. 41, 79–88.
Pépin,
D., Cargnelutti, B., Gonzalez, G., Joachim, J.
and Reby, D. (2001) Diurnal and seasonal variations of
roaring activity of farmed red deer stags. Applied
Animal Behaviour Science. 74 (3), 233–239.
Pollard,
J.C. and Littlejohn, R.P. (1996) The effects of
pen size on the behaviour of farmed red deer stags in
confined yards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 47,
247–253.
Pollard,
J.C. and Littlejohn, R.P. (1999) Activities and
social relationships of red deer at pasture. NZ Vet. J.
47 (3), 83–87.
Pollard,
J.C., Littlejohn, R.J. (1996) The effects of pen
size on the behaviour of farmed red deer stags confined
in yards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47,
pp 247–253.
Pollard,
J.C., Littlejohn, R.P. and Suttie, J.M. (1992)
Behaviour and weight change of red deer calves during
different weaning procedures. Applied Animal
Behaviour Science, 35, pp 23–33.
Pollard,
J.C., Littlejohn, R.P., (1994) Behavioural
effects of light conditions on red deer in a holding pen.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 41, 127–134
Pollard,
J.C.and Littlejohn, R.P. (1999) Activities and
social relationships of red deer at pasture. New
Zealand Veterinary Journal, 47:3, pp 83–87.
Recarte,
J.M., Vincent, J.P. and Hewison, A.J.M.
(1998) Flight responses of park fallow deer to the
human observer. Behavioural processes. 44 (1),
65–72.
Vankova,
D., Bartos, L., Cizova-Schroffelova, D.,
Nespor, F. and Jandurova, O. (2001) Mother-offspring
bonding in farmed red deer: Accuracy of visual observation
verified by DNA analysis. Applied Animal
Behaviour Science. 73 (2), 157–165.
Waas, J.R.,
Ingram, J.R. and Matthews, L.R. (1997)
Physiological responses of red deer to conditions
experienced during road transport. Physiology and
Behaviour. 61 (6), 931–938.
Whittington, C.J. and Chamove, A.S. (1995) Effects of
visual cover on farmed red deer behaviour. Applied
Animal Science, 45, pp 309–314
Wiepkema,
P.R. (1990) Stress: Ethological
Implications. In: Puglisi-Allegra, S. und Oliverio, A.
(Hrsg.): Psychobiology of stress. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, S. 1-13. Cited by: Diverio, S, Goddard,
P.J., Gordon, I.J. and Elston, D.A. (1993) The effect of
management on stress in farmed red deer (Cervus
elaphus) and its modulation by long acting neuroleptics:
behavioural responses, Applied Animal
Behavioural Science, 36, 363–376.
Yerex, D.
1979. Deer Farming in New Zealand. Publ.
by Deer Farming Services, N.Z.
Yerex, D.
1982. The Farming of Deer. Agricultural
Promotion Associates Ltd., Wellington, N.Z.